[BitVisor-devel-en:13] Re: Bitvisor memory protection

[Nafise Sadat Moosavi]

Thank you very much for your guidance.

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Hideki EIRAKU <hdk at igel.co.jp> wrote:

> From: Nafise Sadat Moosavi <ns.moosavi at gmail.com>
> Subject: [BitVisor-devel-en:11] Re: Bitvisor memory protection
> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:23:08 +0430
> Message-ID: <BANLkTinW9ZNT0By4FjSg69QfeMAn-p92_Q at mail.gmail.com>
>
> > Is it possible to implement a complete shadow paging mechanism (like XEN)
> in
> > Bitvisor in order to have more complicated protection mechanisms for
> memory?
>
> BitVisor already has a complete shadow paging mechanism. I did not
> want to implement such complex mechanism in BitVisor, but it is needed
> by BitVisor's memory protection and MMIO hooks. Therefore, the
> gmm_pass_gp2hp() function can have more complicated protection
> mechanisms or address translation.
>
> --
> Hideki EIRAKU <hdk at igel.co.jp>
> _______________________________________________
> BitVisor-devel-en mailing list
> BitVisor-devel-en at bitvisor.org
> https://www.bitvisor.org/mailman/listinfo/bitvisor-devel-en
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.bitvisor.org/archives/bitvisor-devel-en/attachments/20110428/ec3ae4a6/attachment.html